So, clearly, some documents are forgeries.

Now, consider this; if one has real evidence, one does not need to resort to forgeries. Moreover, if one has real evidence, one does not risk adding forgeries to the pile because the exposure of a forgery casts doubt on the rest of the evidence, even if genuine. So, people who have real evidence don't risk forgery. There is too little to gain and too much to use. Therefore, the presence of a single forged document proves that the party doing the forgery KNOWS there is no real evidence. Hence the answer to the posed question is that the presence of the Niger forgeries and the fake IDs means that ALL of the "terrorists" documents are fakes. - M. R.

Nixon was forced out of office over an Obstruction charge, but that was the lesser scandal to conceal a greater one, the truth behind the JFK assassination.

This may be a repeat. Lying to trick the people into a war is a scandal that could (and should) bring down the government. But the Abramoff scandal may be a means to eject those responsible for the lies in a manner which does not threaten the government itself.

Now, normally, I would say that getting rid of the crooks while saving the government would be a good idea, except that I do not see such a path benefiting We The People. We will still be stuck with a government so deeply in debt that it has no choice but to drive us all into poverty to prolong its own power and privilege. - M. R.

"Who is congress listening to?"

And "The Mother of All Scandals."

So, if you are reading this, and you are Jewish, please take to heart a warning I put out on this site years ago. Israel, in using you to hide their crimes behind, has made a target of you in the inevitable backlash. Israel does not care if you get harmed or killed, indeed they will welcome it and gleefully wave your bloodied body around to serve their political interests. - M. R.

But an organized program that exists to arrest and deport those who ask questions about the Holocaust is in effect a flashing neon sign that someone is very worried that the questions make sense, and that fear exists that the answers may be listened to and are a threat to the orthodoxy.

Not since Galileo have we seen such repression of inquiry and the free exchange of ideas. And it is this repression that advertises to the world that something very dark is being hidden from the public.

Freedom of speech must apply to all, or it applies to none. If Irving and Zundel can be jailed for asking about the obvious problems with the official story of the holocaust, how long will it be before we can be jailed for asking questions about the obvious problems with Iraq's WMDs, 9-11, OK City, TWA 800, the Kennedy assassination, the Martin Luther King assassination, or any of the other hundreds of obvious government lies and deceptions?

I don;t give a damn about the history of WW2 Germany. That's the middle of the last century and we have problems today. But when anyone with an opinion can be thrown in jail because of that opinion, then we live in a dictatorship by any definition of that word.

And that is what this debate is about, whether will will be free people with freedom of thought and freedom of speech, or whether we will live in a dictatorship, where one can be thrown in prison for refusing to believe as we are told to believe.

Make your choice. - M. R.

PS, I watched the ABC Good Morning America interview of Porter Goss yesterday from the waiting room of the car repair shop. When Porter said the CIA does not use torture, everyone in that waiting room started laughing. You are not living a Tom Clancy novel; this is real life, and you are looking stupid. - M. R.

Likewise too, the curators of the Auschwitz museum must also be guilty of "Holocaust denial" because in 1990 the Auschwitz museum, working from the camp records, revised the estimated number of dead downward from four million to one and one half million. This new number directly contradicts the popularized orthodox account. So, if Zundel and Irving are guilty of "Holocaust denial" by looking at the actual available facts, so too are the curators of the Auschwitz museum.

Book 'em, Dano! - M. R.

Make sure to show this to your kids before the recruiters can get to them. - M. R.

More about the OK City bombing HERE - M. R.

I want to know if the phone company is selling our call records to these websites, or if they are just hacking into our phones. - M. R.

Meanwhile, if Zundel, Irving, Rudolph and Verbeke are being sent to jail for challenging the orthodox story, then why hasn't the International Red Cross been arrested? after all, they had access to the German camps, both POW and labor, and their official reports do not support the orthodox accounts popularized in novels, TV shows, and films.

And, if Zundel, Irving, Rudolph and Verbeke are being sent to jail for challenging the orthodox story, then so too should the curators of the Auschwitz museum, for daring to revise downward the total number of dead at the camps from 4 million to1 1/2 million in 1990.

Nobody locks up people who claim to see Bigfoot, or who think Elvis is alive. People with such loony notions are simply allowed their freedom of speech, then ridiculed, then ignored. If Zundel, Irving, Rudolph and Verbeke are totally crazy, why the intense pressure to steal them from their homes and ship them to Germany for the crime of simply not agreeing with a particular spin of the history of WW2?

Truth needs no laws to support it. Throughout history, from Galileo to Zundel, only lies and liars have resorted to the courts to enforce adherence to dogma. More than anything else, it is the extreme tactics employed by the defenders of the orthodoxy that calls into doubt the accuracy of the history they proclaim to the world. - M. R.