Know how to tell the difference
between the truth and lies of 9/11? If they're talking
about hijackers having done the dastardly deed, you know
they're part of the sinister coverup extravaganza,
wittingly or not.
In order for the people of the world to be convinced that
Islamic hijackers were responsible for terrible tragedy
of 9/11, we need to see some evidence. Not hearsay,
innuendo, aspersion or promises of evidence, but real
Otherwise, the whole subject is rightly regarded as a
ruse, a setup to conceal the identities of the real
culprits, the ones who sit smugly in front of the TV
cameras and plot their cynical war on terror
otherwise known as the war on the peoples of the world.
As President Bush continues to insist that his word be
accepted as truth on numerous questions, time after time
his statements have been revealed as blatant falsehoods.
Yet he continues to repeat them, and the whorish
corporate media continues to accept them.
Why hasn't either the Bush administration or some element
of law enforcement in the United States issued a single
solid piece of evidence connecting the hijackers to the
hijacked airplanes? Why dont the alleged hijackers
appear on the airport security videos? Why arent
there credit card records of their ticket purchases?
Why did FBI director Robert Mueller say very publicly to
the Commonwealth Club of San Francisco that nothing on
paper connected Arab terrorists to 9/11? I mean, two and
half years have passed. And the feds produced 19 names
within 72 hours of the disaster. Notice a mathematical
inconsistency here? All that has happened since is mere
vigilante hysteria, hypothetical scenarios trumpeted ad
nauseum by Americas notoriously brainwashed Zionist
Seven or eight of the names on that original list have
been found living comfortably in other countries. Why
hasnt the FBI made any attempt to correct the
errors made on that original list? See for yourself.
And why, after much hullabaloo about Colin Powell using
phony information in his remarks to the United Nations
about the reasons for war, hasnt the U.S.
government produced a single conclusive piece of evidence
to back up its claim that 9/11 was the work Osama bin
Laden and other Islamic terrorists? Not a single piece!
If you disagree, tell me what it is!
There's a simple answer to this, you know. It's because
there isn't any evidence. And why is that? Because those
pseudo-Muslims revealed to be so publicly incompetent at
piloting jerkwater training planes had absolutely zero
chance of flying sophisticated jetliners into anything
narrower than the Grand Canyon, never mind executing
tricky maneuvers with extraordinarily complicated
The unknown men who played the roles of the so-called
Arab terrorist hijackers were really recruited by either
American and/or Israeli intelligence services in a scheme
set up as a diversion to inflame dumb Westerners against
the Islamic world. The purpose was to divert the
worlds attention from the Israeli genocide and
dispossession of the Palestinians by blaming the attacks
But that was only half the objective. The other half was
to enable our despicable cabal of neocon gangbangers to
fleece the American public with an endless array of
no-bid contracts to enrich the conscienceless
billionaires who are really driving the war machine.
You know how the Bushista American government uses
anything for PR to supposedly authenticate its own evil
agenda. If they had any concrete evidence against the
hijackers if they even possessed all their correct
names we would have heard about it by now. There
would be an avalanche of TV shows about them, unlike that
Jewish claptrap hate crime against Muslims that appeared
on NBC the other night.
After two and half years, with the whole world knowing
that eight of the 19 names on the hijacker list are
fraudulent, the FBI has made no attempt to substitute new
names. And why is that? Because the identities of the
hijackers were constructed with mostly stolen papers, for
some of the patsies designed to take the heat. In any
case, and whoever they were, there is no evidence they
ever got on the planes.
But nothing. Instead we have one minor player convicted
in Germany, then the conviction was overturned, partly
because Americans refused to help with the prosecution.
We have the so-called 20th hijacker and assorted other
preposterous character actors languishing in jails on
trumped up charges. We have security camera film at the
Pentagon, which surely reveal that no jetliner hit that
building, locked away in Ashcroft's vault under the phony
aegis of national security. We have all the rubble of the
World Trade Center, which surely would have revealed the
use of nuclear explosives creating shattered beams in odd
places, instantly carted away with no forensic
investigation. We have transcripts but no
recordings of these phony cellphone calls, some
from people who may not have even existed.
And we have the famous standdown, in which America's air
defenses suddenly evaporated the only time in our
history this has happened.
We have Marvin Bush sitting suspiciously on the board of
directors of the security company that had the contract
for the Twin Towers.
We have Larry Silverstein, who conveniently leased and
insured the towers shortly before the big hits, telling
officials to "pull" a relatively intact tower,
which then fell identically to the two structures that
were struck by airplanes, creating the impression that
that's the way all three came down.
We have billions of dollars of windfall profits made by
savvy investors in the days before 9/11, and an FBI
investigation that insists nothing was amiss with these
spectacular deals. Of course, we don't get the details.
Only "assurances" that the trades were not
suspicious, despite patterns and results that were
unprecedented in the entire history of financial trading.
We have reports from firemen of explosions at the base of
the Twin Towers BEFORE they fell, and the seismographic
evidence to back up these assertions.
We have leader after leader saying they didn't know such
a thing could happen when the government had been
studying the problem for ten years. It had held at least
two major drills simulating such a possibility.
And we have a president sitting in a ghetto classroom in
Florida, at possibily the most pivotal moment in American
history, pretending to read a book that he was holding
Perhaps most tellingly of all, we have the tragic tale of
John ONeill, rabidly honest FBI investigator,
prevented from following his leads about Osama bin Laden
because of the danger he would have discovered the links
from Afghanistan back to CIA headquarters. Just review
the way he was prevented from conducting his probe of the
Cole bombing, and prevented by digging into other leads
by the same guys namely insiders Louis Freeh and
Thomas Picard who prevented significant reports
from other FBI agents from seeing the light of day.
So, how does all that make you regard the supposedly
impartial government panel investigating these matters?
When they talk about Presidential Daily Briefings months
before the event, or chitchat with presidential flunkies
who leak out these pseudorevelations about this and that
tidbit of essentially trivial information. And especially
when they talk about the dastardly hijackers (without
being able to name them) as if there is no question of
their guilt. Talk about your misleading urban legends!
This one is the champ.
Well, no sense feigning surprise. We knew this commission
was a set-up from the get-go. Recycled Watergate
investigators, even. Part of the same bunch that has run
the country and covered up everything for the past 30
years or more.
Surely you didn't expect a real investigation. Thomas
Kean declared at the outset of his hearings that Osama
bin Laden was guilty. End of discussion. As soon as he
made that statement, there was no way the hearings could
Asserting that genuine Arab hijackers did not carry out
the attacks of 9/11 requires analysis of two concomitant
categories: the history of American (and Israeli)
involvement (and subterfuge) with Arab terrorists, and
methods of remote control of aircraft, or other means of
piloting the aircraft.
The remote control aspect continues to be a bone of
contention among legitimate pilots, with some asserting
only real pilots could have made such extemporaneous
maneuvers and others insisting only remote control could
have accomplished such a feat. An interesting new
perspective on this debate can be found here:
A third natural area of study in this regard would be the
intimate histories of those whom officials claim to be
the hijackers, including putting the microscope on their
behavior in the days and weeks before the tragedy.
Many researchers claim the name al-Qaeda was made up in
middle 90s by a variety of American functionaries
(one of them being none other than Richard Clarke) as an
all-purpose villain the U.S. could blame as a convenient
reason for its military adventurism. And a group of
Israeli provocateurs was recently discovered trying to
create their own faux version of al-Qaeda.
How many more hints do you need? The absence of any
relevant arrests or discovery of any clues to the
hierarchy of this supposedly worldwide terror group
should tell you a lot.
Al-Qaeda doesnt exist except for when they want it
to, to blame for any sort of strategic terror they have
created themselves for some political reason, like
influencing the elections in Spain. Hah, that one really
Why havent American intelligence operatives gone to
these foreign countries to interview these named
hijackers who turned out to be alive? Simple. Because
they knew the list was fiction in the first place, and
the Arab-types who have been named as terror gurus are
mostly their own employees, or people who have been set
up by them.
It is a celebrated fact that Mohammed Atta and some of
his friends were seen in nightclubs in the hours before
9/11, certainly a fact that argues against them being
able to carry out their supposed missions because they
were motivated by Islamic religious zeal. So their
appearance in strip clubs blows the whole story that they
were devout Muslims giving their lives to Allah. Devout
Muslims don't drink, never mind cavort with strippers.
If we knew who the hijackers were, we'd know their names,
wouldn't we? Or is it now worth bombing other nations and
murdering thousands of innocent people because we say we
know who the hijackers were, even though we don't know
their names? It is the great shame of the American people
that they have approved of the murders of thousands of
people because of that blatant lie.
Many of the men who were fingered as 9/11 hijackers
received preferential treatment from American immigration
officials when it came to entering and leaving the U.S.
on numerous occasions. Many of these same names
reportedly trained at various U.S. military
What has resulted after two and a half years of work by
Americas crack intelligence agencies, besides the
persecution of Muslims throughout the world?
Well, hundreds of innocent people have been unjustly
imprisoned and tortured at Guantanamo. All of them
innocent, hapless dupes rounded up in a Rumsfeld-ordered
dragnet in Pakistan after U.S. planes had (inadvertently
or otherwise) allowed the Taliban fighters to escape with
the Pakistani army from Afghanistan.
Two pathetic flunkies have been arrested and held without
due process. One of them, the notoriously pathetic shoe
bomber who was obviously a deranged personality and not a
member of any terror network, was ceremoniously sentenced
to life in prison.
Other than that, no al-Qaeda kingpins have been even
named, never mind apprehended. No clue about how the 9/11
attacks were engineered has ever emerged. This is simply
not consistent with being able to name all 19 hijackers
the day after the attacks. It is a case of pretending you
have all of the information instantly, and then
pretending you no information for the next two years.
What a smell!
This means two things: that the list of 19 names was a
total fabrication, and that the worldwide terror network
called al-Qaeda is also a total fabrication, the wet
dream brainchild of the CIA and the Mossad to be trotted
out as an excuse for a whole string of terror attacks
Madrid, Bali, Riyadh, Istanbul, etc. that
were really carried out by the CIA and the Mossad
themselves, cleverly involving designated patsies to give
the operations a suitably foreign flavor.
Al-Qaeda does not exist except as a bogeyman invented by
Western powers to justify their evil agenda. There were
no hijackers flying those planes on 9/11. And honest FBI
agents have been prevented from publicizing that fact.
If you disagree, prove it! The world knows you
cant, though the high-tech mass murder by the
United States and Israel spreads around the world because
of this falsified version of events.
History will show and the public will soon realize
that those who are telling these lies not only
allowed 9/11 to happen, but planned it for their own
The only question that remains is will the American
public awaken to this murderous, treasonous scam before
the perpetrators achieve their objective and bury the
whole planet in the flames of their insane perfidy.
Just remember. If theyre talking about the
hijackers, theyre part of the coverup, whether they
know it or not.
Much more productive would be analyzing the tiny hole in
the Pentagon, how the ejected material in the WTC photos
prove there were unexplained explosions, or how those
emotional cellphone calls could not possibly have been
made as government flunkies have presented them.
But you wont hear the official 9/11 commissioners
talking about any of that, because they are definitely
part of the coverup. You can obviously tell, because they
keep talking about the hijackers.
Other than a general alert to citizens of the world about
the basic lies that continue to underlie all political
debate in the United States at this time, there is
another, more pressing reason to discuss and contemplate
all these matters at this time.
On Tuesday, April 20, and Wednesday, April 28, the U.S.
Supreme Court will hear arguments on the power claimed by
the President to designate people as "enemy
combatants" and have them incarcerated by the
military indefinitely, without charges, and
without access to the court system--solely on his say-so.
As my friend Alvin notes, This is a critical moment
in United States history.
How the court rules on these cases will determine
the type of country we will be living in. We urge those
of you who can to be present outside the Supreme Court on
these dates, said Alvin. For more information
please see http://www.nlg.org/eccases/
It is one thing to realize all law enforcement and
defense strategies in America in 2004 have become lies.
It is quite another to incorporate those lies into the
law itself, and that is about to happen next week.
The decision expected will make a time of darkness grow
even darker, and practically guarantee that freedom and
justice for all is now an outmoded phrase that has been
conveniently discarded by the evil robots who now control
the lives of every person on earth.
John Kaminski is the author of Americas
Autopsy Report, a collection of his Internet essays
seen on hundreds of websites around the world, and also
The Day America Died: Why You Shouldnt
Believe the Official Story of What Happened on September
11, 2001, a 48-page booklet written for those who
insist on believing the governments version of
events. For more information about both, go to