Her investigation shows that 60% of children in the Texas foster care system are being drugged with powerful psychotropic drugs that have not been approved for children. Yet, "Children as young as 3 are receiving
powerful, mind-altering drugs."
She suspects foster children are being given psychiatric drugs "so they're more docile, or so doctors and drug companies can make a buck."
A mother reported her son's experience with the antipsychotic drug, Zyprexa: "He put on a tremendous amount of weight, 85 pounds to be exact," she said, adding that as doctors continued to increase his medications starting at age 5, he experienced troubles in school and with the law and was hospitalized repeatedly."
The Houston Chronicle reports that Risperdal and Zyprexa - made up half of the drugs prescribed to foster children in Texas. These drugs are among the most dangerous of psychotropic drugs. They carry new FDA-required warnings about diabetes, blood clots and strokes.
Dr. Tony Appel, a neuropsychologist from Florida who examined the Texas records agrees:
"We're taking away their future. We're taking away their ability to relate to people; trust, love caring, ability to put yourself in the other person's shoes and see how they see you. We take all that away from these children. We blunt their emotion."
Ever protective of the drug industry, the Texas Medical Association expressed skepticism about Comptroller Strayhorn's concerns. It is appalling that the Texas Medical Association sees nothing wrong in violating medicine's first principle, "do no harm" - if doing harm increases profits for psychotropic drug manufacturers.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Skitherockies: 4/20/2008 7:39:00 AM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Skitherockies: 4/20/2008 7:48:00 AM
How Rick Perry sold out Republicans and set himself up in the drug business:
By CHRISTY HOPPE / The Dallas Morning News
choppe@dallasnews.com
AUSTIN – Gov. Rick Perry – usually a hero to social conservatives –
surprised many of them Friday by making Texas the first state to mandate a vaccine for sixth-grade girls to prevent a sexually transmitted infection that leads to most kinds of cervical cancer.
In his executive order, Mr. Perry said girls must receive the human papillomavirus vaccine before school starts in September 2008. While noting that parents may opt out of the vaccine for conscience or religious reasons, he said it "provides us with an incredible opportunity to effectively target and prevent cervical cancer."
The move was applauded by many women's groups but harshly denounced by social conservatives for its intrusion into parents' control over their kids' health. Some also alleged that Merck – the pharmaceutical company with the only vaccine on the market – was responsible for the initiative.
"Follow the money. It leads to Merck," said
Cathie Adams, president of the conservative Texas Eagle Forum.
Merck had provided a relatively small amount of money to Mr. Perry's campaign fund – $5,000 in 2006 – and has paid three lobbyists up to $250,000 this year. One of the lobbyists, Mike Toomey, was formerly Mr. Perry's chief of staff.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Skitherockies: 4/20/2008 7:55:00 AM
Are Rick Perry and Greg Abott and Barbara Walthers headed for Trial?
In 1997 the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), noted in its judgment on Jorgic v. Germany case that in 1992 the majority of legal scholars took the narrow view that "intent to destroy"
in the CPPCG meant the intended physical-biological destruction of the protected group and that this was still the majority opinion. But the ECHR also noted that a minority took a broader view and did not consider biological-physical destruction was necessary as the intent to destroy a group as a social unit was enough to qualify as genocide.[11]
While precise definition varies among genocide scholars, a legal definition is found in the 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Article 2, of this convention defines genocide as "any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."[1]
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
European Court of Human Rights Judgement in Jorgic v. Germany (Application no. 74613/01) paragraphs 18, 36,74
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~