KIEV, Ukraine – Several NATO countries have decided to allocate additional investments to the trust funds through which Ukraine receives military assistance.
This information was confirmed by the Deputy Prime Minister of Ukraine, Ivanna Klimpush-Tsintsadze, after the meeting of the Ukraine-NATO Commission at the level of ambassadors, reports Ukrinform agency .
“Several countries even announced today that they add additional resources to our programs, or to trust funds,” he said.
In particular, according to the policy, Norway has already announced the decision to provide additional 140,000 euros for the professional development program of NATO. In addition, the Minister of Defense of the Czech Republic also signed a decree on the allocation of additional funds to the logistics trust fund.
Germany also confirmed that it would make an additional contribution to the trust fund for the medical rehabilitation of Ukrainian military personnel, added the deputy prime minister.
Folks, this is one of those geopolitical issues, like Yemen, where we need to have a broad-based, fact-centric discussion, right out here in the open, to inquire of our government just what the heck is going on on Ukraine, and why the US government saw fit (under President Obama's watch, I may add)to have its duly elected President, Yanukovych thrown under the proverbial bus so that Poroshenko could be anointed as its saviour.
And please remember: President Obama admitted, in a TV interview on CNN, that the US had been part of the group responsible for brokering this deal.
President Obama admitted that Washington was behind Ukraine coup, and brokered a deal in support of regime change.
Of course, this is how Washington does business, and is not unique to Ukraine.
Please remember:
They did this to the Iranian people in 1953: 1953: CIA assisted coup overthrows the government of Iran
The US government actively aided and abetted the regime change in Chile in 1973 Chile's regime change
They supported governmental violence against its people in ArgentinaKissinger Supported Argentina's "dirty war"
The US invaded Afghanistan in 2001: The US war in Afghanistan started in 2001
The US government facilitated regime change in Iraq through invasion and occupation, beginning in 2003 US begins its war against Iraq, 2003
The US and NATO, invaded Libya in March 2011, and created regime change when
shortly thereafter with his extrajudicial assassination: Never forget why Muammar Gaddafi was killed: href="https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/libya/obamas-libya-debacle">Libya: Obama's debacle
They continue this policy with Bahrain, in supporting the dictatorial monarchy there, whose human rights stance is just to the right of Attila the Hun. Bahrain's silenced revolution
The US government still supports Saudi Arabia in its horrific treatment of its people America is fawning over Saudi Arabia’s repressive dictatorThe US government and military is still aiding and abetting Saudi war crimes in Yemen Why does the US government support Saudi war crimes in Yemen?!?
And of course, one of the most current attempts at "intervention and regime change" would be Syria, where, at least, President Trump has had the "come to Logic" moment, and has decided to get our troops out of there. President Trump orders US troop withdrawal from Syria And BTW, please remember: Bashar Al Asad never invited the US troops in the first place; Russia and Iran were invited to assist the the Syrian government with getting out the US funded/trained/equipped jihadis, and they did a wonderful job.
So looking all of this and taking it into consideration how long the US government has been doing this since the end of World War II, one reaches an inescapable conclusion: US military intervention and attempted regime change, is not an aberration for US foreign policy; it has become the norm.
And I would politely caution President Trump that a war against Russia right now, with some kind of "false flag" to be blamed against Russia happening somewhere in Ukraine, would be one of the most pig-headedly, ham-fistedly idiotic things the US government could possibly do right now.
And I say this, because I care very deeply about this country, and the hard, cold reality here, is that this country's military doesn't have the troop strength, the money, the manufacturing, or the weaponry, to insure a positive result of a war against Russia at this time.