Behind The Bible Fraud - What Was The Church Trying To Hide? | WHAT REALLY HAPPENED

Behind The Bible Fraud - What Was The Church Trying To Hide?

When I first spoke to a close Christian friend of mine about the publishing of Tony Bushby's The Bible Fraud, her reaction was one that many Christians have expressed, and one that made me aghast. She didn't want the book available because it would "persuade them away from the Bible and the word of God." Further discussions with her and many other Christians around the world about The Bible Fraud all result in the Bible being quoted as the ultimate reference for the apparent "words of God," and therefore the basis for their arguments. The problem lies in that they believe the Bible is infallible.

If we examine the oldest known Bible to date, the "Sinai Bible" housed in the British Museum (I believe that, during his many years of research, Tony had a private viewing of this priceless book), we find a staggering 14,800 differences from today's Bible and yet it still remains the word of God?

Webmaster's Commentary: 

In Genesis 1; humans are created after the animals. In Genesis 2; humans are created before the animals. Clearly both accounts cannot possibly be correct. One of them must be wrong.

In Genesis 1, man and woman are created simultaneously, together. In Genesis 2, man is created first, then woman afterward. Clearly both accounts cannot possibly be correct. One of them must be wrong.

In Matthew, one genealogy of Jesus back to David through Roboam is given. In Luke, Jesus is claimed to be descended from David through Roboam's brother Nathan. Clearly both accounts cannot possibly be correct. One of them must be wrong. If one accepts the myth that Jesus was the son of God, then both paternal genealogies are not only in error, but rather pointless.

Comments

SHARE THIS ARTICLE WITH YOUR SOCIAL MEDIA