MANHATTAN DISTRICT ATTORNEY SAYS HE’LL NO LONGER ACCEPT CONTRIBUTIONS FROM LAWYERS WITH CASES BEFORE HIM | WHAT REALLY HAPPENED


MANHATTAN DISTRICT ATTORNEY SAYS HE’LL NO LONGER ACCEPT CONTRIBUTIONS FROM LAWYERS WITH CASES BEFORE HIM

After controversy over how he handled two prominent investigations, Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. said he would no longer take campaign donations from defense attorneys with cases before him.

Vance said his campaign will no longer accept contributions in any amount from such lawyers and will cap donations from their law partners. Vance was re-elected in November to a four-year term.

The district attorney also will not solicit contributions personally and will have his campaign shield him from the identities of his donors. Candidates for judgeships in New York state follow similar guidelines.

In October, ProPublica, WNYC and The New Yorker reported that Vance had overruled prosecutors who wanted to bring felony fraud charges against two of the president’s children, Ivanka Trump and Donald Trump Jr. The office had been investigating the two for making misleading statements as their father’s company attempted to sell apartments in a struggling condominium and hotel in downtown Manhattan called the Trump SoHo.

During the investigation, in 2012, Vance met with Donald Trump’s lawyer Marc Kasowitz. Kasowitz had donated $25,000 to Vance for his first re-election campaign. Vance returned the donation before the meeting. Then he declined to prosecute anyone in connection with the investigation. A few months later, Vance accepted more than $50,000 from Kasowitz and lawyers at his New York firm, Kasowitz Benson. Vance, in comments to ProPublica at the time, denied that Kasowitz influenced his decisions, but announced that he would return the second donation from the lawyer.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

The question I have, is why is this not ilegal to have sitting judges accept "donations" (read: bribes) from attorneys over whose cases they may be presiding?!?

This smacks of a complete contempt for what is supposed to be "due process".

Comments

WHY THE HELL DO JUDGES NEED

wonderingthomas

WHY THE HELL DO JUDGES NEED "DONATIONS"???

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE WITH YOUR SOCIAL MEDIA