NO extension of US pullback: Iraq | WHAT REALLY HAPPENED

NO extension of US pullback: Iraq

BAGHDAD: Iraq will not extend the June 30 deadline for US troops to withdraw from urban areas despite concerns about a resurgence of violence in recent weeks, a spokesman said yesterday. The government has insisted it is committed to the timeline laid out in a US -Iraqi security agreement that calls for American forces to pull back from urban areas by the summer and from the rest of the country by the end of 2011.

But a series of high-profile bombings have cast doubt on the readiness of Iraqi forces to take over security responsibilities. In particular, US commanders have pointed to the volatile northern city of Mosul as a possible exception to the withdrawal plans. Government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh, however, said the deadlines were "non-extendable." "These dates cannot be extended and this is consistent with the transfer and handover of responsibility to Iraqi security forces," al-Dabbagh said in a statement. Th
e Pentagon said the announcement was in line with its plans.

We have said all along that we are planning to abide by the security agreement," said Air Force Lt. Col. Patrick Ryder, a Pentagon spokesman in Washington. "We've said that any request to stay in the cities longer will come from the Iraqi government." Underscoring the dangers still facing Iraqis, two car bombs exploded almost simultaneously in Baghdad near the Oil Ministry and a police academy, said police officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to the media.

At least three people were killed and eight wounded in the attack, according to the US military. North of the capital, a Sunni tribal group that turned against al-Qaeda in Iraq postponed plans to disband yesterday after receiving reassurances that its leader would be released, the acting chief said.
The move could avert the latest showdown between Iraq's Shiite-dominated government and the Sunni groups that have accused it of unfairly targeting its members for past bloodshed.

Any step back by the so-called Awakening Councils could leave areas more vulnerable to attacks from insurgents, who have sharply increased bombings in the past month. The Awakening Councils, which originally were funded by the US military but are now the government's responsibility, are considered a key factor in security gains over the past two years. But tensions have risen over arrests and allegations that the government has not come through with pledges for Sunni reconciliation and offers of official
security posts to members of the groups.

Mullah Nadhim al-Jubouri, the leader of the Awakening Council in Duluiyah, and his two brothers were arrested Saturday by US -Iraqi forces. A US military statement did not mention specific allegations against the three but said they were wanted for "terrorism." But Iraqi officials said the charges included carrying out attacks in 2005 and 2006 such as the downing a US helicopter and targeting a police station near Duluiyah, about 45 miles (75 kilometers) north of Baghdad. Sunni leaders denounced the arres
ts as a sign the Shiite-led government may be more interested in settling past scores than finding reconciliation. Acting Duluiyah Awakening Council leader Mohammed Khalil Ibrahim threatened to disband the group in the area they control north of Baghdad unless its leader was freed by early yesterday.

But Ibrahim said yesterday that he had met with al-Jubouri at the police station in nearby Balad and was told orders had been issued to release him soon. The group had canceled a meeting planned for yesterday to announce its plans to disband after hearing the news, he said.

The arrests raised new questions over how to sort out the messy histories of the thousands of tribal fighters who went from enemies to allies. Some Awakening Council members were active in the insurgency or sympathizers before becoming disenchanted with al-Qaeda's widespread attacks on civilians and their reliance on non-Iraqi leaders.

An amnesty law adopted last year allows officials to clear the slate for some past offenses, but does not cover allegations such as terrorism, kidnapping and rape. "We ask the government to release him," said another of Nadhim al-Jubouri's brothers, Mahir. "He had a role in defeating al-Qaeda. Does he deserve to be arrested?" Associated Press Writers Saad Abdul-Kadir and Muhieddin Rashad contributed to this report. - AP