This video is a followup to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0GHVE...
In its draft report, released in August 2008, NIST attempted to cover up evidence that WTC7 fell at freefall, but the coverup was transparent. In its final report, released in November 2008, NIST finally acknowledged freefall, but couched it in a bizarre framework that continues to deny its clear significance. Part I chronicles NIST's attempted obfuscation and eventual admission of freefall. Part II demonstrates that their replacement theory is based on fabricated evidence and is a continuation of the coverup. Part III will spell out the significance of NIST's admission of freefall.
Go to www.AE911truth.org and sign the petition for a REAL investigation.
Take a look at the NIST spokesperson, John Gross, on this video as he lays out the NIST version of the WTC 7 collapse timeline and see if he doesn't appear from his body language to be nervous about something (e.g. knowingly participating in a coverup). To me, he has the air of a 6 year old who knocked the cookie jar off the counter while reaching for an unauthorized cookie and is now saying, "No Mom, it wasn't me. I think it must have been the cat."
More commentary and discussion on this at: http://www.911blogger.com/node/18951