FIVE MAJOR REVELATIONS THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA IS IGNORING ABOUT THE FLORIDA SHOOTING | WHAT REALLY HAPPENED


FIVE MAJOR REVELATIONS THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA IS IGNORING ABOUT THE FLORIDA SHOOTING

One of the deadliest school shootings in American history took place this week in Parkland, Florida and the suspected gunman has since confessed to this most heinous act. As details unfold, however, the mainstream media is failing to ask the hard questions which need to be answered.

While the media frantically attempts to use Nikolas Cruz to push their political agenda, bombshell revelations are being ignored, perhaps deliberately.

While corporate media continues to use this incident to ram divide down society’s throat and push for gun confiscation, those of us in the alternative media world are asking questions that matter. The Free Thought Project has compiled a list of five major details about the shooting that took place Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School that the media is conveniently choosing to ignore.

5. CRUZ WAS REPORTEDLY TAKING ANTIDEPRESSANTS
In a likely attempt to protect their corporate sponsors in the pharmaceutical industry, the fact that Cruz’s family told reporters that he was on medication for depression has managed to remain all but a blip in the mainstream.

As TFTP reported, the people who knew Cruz described him as a troubled teenager who was adopted when he was young and then was forced to move in with a friend after both of his adopted parents died. Jim Lewis, an attorney for the family that gave Cruz a place to live after his mother died in November, told The Washington Post that they knew Cruz was depressed, but they believed he taking steps to manage his depression.

Family member Barbara Kumbatovich told the Herald, “she believed Nikolas Cruz was on medication to deal with his emotional fragility.” She was a sister-in-law of Lynda Cruz, the suspect’s mother, and she also told the Sun-Sentinel that she believes Nikolas has been on medications for several months.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

If you have never taken a journey to this blog, I strongly suggest you do, particularly if your medical professional (a.k.a, a "legal drug pusher") is advising you that your teenager desperately needs anti-anxiety medication, and right the heck now. This site can be seen at:

www.ssristories.com

What the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors have been documented to do, is cause suicidal, or homicidal thoughts, which can get translated into very real, horrific destruction of life, as we saw in the Florida shooting last week.

Please remember; many Doctors are given "compensation", either covert, or overt, for prescribing various drugs from the pharmaceutical companies which manufacture them, some times for uses the FDA has not approved.

It is a completely reasonable question to ask, when these kinds of drugs are suggested for your child: is the prescribing physician being compensated for prescribing these drugs by the drug manufacturer?!?

Remind your doctor about the dustup when Pfizer was compensating Doctors to push Neurontin for off-label uses (Gabapentin)

Gabapentin Side Effects

The article goes on to state: "Pfizer, the manufacturer of the brand name Neurontin, got into major trouble when it marketed this drug for off-label uses. A company has historically not been allowed to promote a medicine for things that the FDA has not approved. In Pfizer’s case, these unofficial uses for Neurontin included bipolar disorder, alcohol withdrawal, migraines and pain. The company eventually paid $430 million in penalties and admitted to fraudulent promotion.

And here is a companion piece you probably should read as well:

Mind-Altering Drug Makers Fund Anti-Gun Agenda

"It isn’t surprising the mainstream media – and late night entertainers – focus on guns instead of SSRIs linked to mass shootings given that they’re well-funded by drug makers.
Virtually every suspected mass shooter was on psychiatric drugs, yet the mainstream media – which is funded by Big Pharma ad revenue – conveniently buries this fact.

That’s likely because Big Pharma spent nearly $6 billion on TV, magazine and digital advertisements in 2016 alone, a healthy sum ad-dependent news outlets cannot ignore.

In fact, the media is so dependent on this ad revenue that some outlets have even launched “health content businesses” to attract consumers targeted by Big Pharma."

Comments

SHARE THIS ARTICLE WITH YOUR SOCIAL MEDIA