Corruption Of The Peer-Review And Publishing Process: “Follow The Silence” | WHAT REALLY HAPPENED X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN

Corruption Of The Peer-Review And Publishing Process: “Follow The Silence”

By Cap Allon

Science is not done by consensus, it isn’t a vote.

“Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you’re being had.” — Michael Crichton

Regarding anthropogenic global warming (AGW), the most widely-publicized “97 percent consensus” study was that done by Australian John Cook. Cook’s study was widely publicized and to this day is still being cited (knowingly or not) by all those in Camp Alarmist: “97 percent of peer-reviewed climate studies confirm that climate change is happening and that human activity is largely responsible.” — John Kerry
FREE Homesteading and Community Building Seminar November 6th

Crucially, though, Kerry’s assumption is patently wrong and demonstrates a complete misunderstanding/misrepresentation of the data. Climate researcher David Legates demolished Cook’s study soon after its publications but, surprise-surprise, Legates’ “0.3% consensus, not 97%” revelation was not so widely circulated...

Comments

SHARE THIS ARTICLE WITH YOUR SOCIAL MEDIA