Top Female Democrats Calling Biden Accuser A Liar | WHAT REALLY HAPPENED X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN

Top Female Democrats Calling Biden Accuser A Liar

Two powerful Democratic women are calling Joe Biden's sexual assault accuser a liar, in sharp contrast to the #MeToo movement's mantra of 'believe all women.'

Stacey Abrams, who hopes to become Biden's vice presidential pick, and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) - whose father was involved with the NXIVM sex cult which exploited countless women, have both rushed to Biden's defense. Now, instead of 'believe all women,' they're saying that women have the 'right to be heard,' but that they don't believe former Biden staffer Tara Reade's claims that he sexually assaulted her in 1993, according to The Hill.

"I know Joe Biden and I think he’s telling the truth and this did not happen," said Abrams in an appearance on CNN.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Joe Biden, if elected, may well not be the first sexual predator elected to the White House What interview did CBS TV edit for Candidate Clinton?, nor, most probably, will he be the last.

We, unfortunately, want "magical" leadership, without blemish or remorse, and when an accuser lets slip that something did happen negatively, there is a huge massive effort, by both parties, to attempt to bury such behaviour under that proverbial rug, which I don't think should ever happen.

But the utter tone-deafness of the Democratic party here would be hysterically funny, were not the stakes so high in November, and they have some other "behavioural anomalies on the part of Biden which I am sure the Republicans will be dishing up for them as "Ukrainian Scandal Tartare", between now, and the election in November.

FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor

God help us, our "choices" come November for President are absolutely appalling, and I would suggest that there may be, on the Democratic side, some chilling and intense maneuvering (most probably by Hillary Rodham Mc Clinton) for the Vice-Presidential spot.

Come January, or perhaps slightly later in the year, as the effects of mental deterioration becomes unmistakeable for "Uncle Joe", the 25th Amendment may well be invoked to send him to a comfortably padded cell in his estate, and Hillary may be sworn in as President, with (most probably) Nancy Pelosi being sworn in as Vice-President.

And should Trump be re-elected, we will still be saddled with a President who would not understand the concept of true statescraft, even if, in a post-Covid 19 world, it reached out and embraced him.

It appears, from his behaviour to date as President, that President Trump only understands bullying, intimidation, threats and war, as the "only way of getting anything done."

His belligerency and hubris do not bode well for the future of this country or peace in this world, should he get re-elected: and folks, that bites, horrifically.

And I have to ask, is this the actual best the Republicans and Democrats can offer up in this year's election, or does it really matter anyway, because what never gets interrupted... is the way in which the US Deep States ALWAYS "gets what it wants", no matter how its goals will simply grind the lives of ordinary working citizens into the mire?!?

Ever noticed that whenever we vote, at least in the national elections, how very little actually, substantially changes, no matter who the candidates are?!?

Just asking.