Challenging our public school district’s obedience of county ‘health’ ‘orders’: Attorneys discussing my case + district Assistant Superintendent who disciplined and censored me emailed my proposed next message to all my school’s teachers (25 of ?) | WHAT REALLY HAPPENED X-Frame-Options: DENY X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN

Challenging our public school district’s obedience of county ‘health’ ‘orders’: Attorneys discussing my case + district Assistant Superintendent who disciplined and censored me emailed my proposed next message to all my school’s teachers (25 of ?)

Perhaps the most helpful communication is a summary of events to the most recent article, the specific updates when they occurred, and preview of coming events (articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25).

Summary (links = full documentation): The California “lockdown orders” we were all told were necessary to “flatten the curve and keep hospitals running” have lasted since March 3, 2020. The California Emergency Services Act (ESA) is derived from California Government Code 8558 (b) that requires “beyond control” hospitals to authorize emergency dictatorial orders. Because Californians never received comprehensive hospital data, our government and corporate media “leaders” are lying in omission. Because problematic “positive cases” (and here, here) were substituted for “beyond control” hospitals, our leaders lie in commission. All testimony I’ve received from ~20 medical professionals here in NorCal report all hospitals they know of have been fully within their control throughout the “pandemic.”

As a NorCal public school teacher, at the start of our school year in September 2020 I inquired to our district’s leadership and teachers’ union how their negotiated policy to “obey” county “health” “orders” is legal given the above reasonable limits to dictatorial authority. I cited our mutual Oath to “support and defend” the US and CA Constitutions. I reminded the district I merely ask them as educated professional adults to perform what we expect from all our Californian Middle School students in our State teaching standards: “Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources.” (page 81).

After two requests, the district contact person responded by ignoring my questions, and that employees are required to obey “California mandates” “to protect you” under threat of being terminated. I emailed our district superintendent, school board members, my school principal and two interested teachers that we teach all high school students in our US History classes that the district’s position of “just following orders” is an illegal defense, and asked again how ESA limits are being honored.

After continued district silence, I filed three legal complaints: federal, state, and a grievance for district violation of worker safety to support apparent dictatorial and illegal policy under direct threat of employment termination, $1,000 fines per violation, and one year imprisonment under Cal. Penal Code §§ 69, 148(a)(1).

Our union responded with support to ask the district, and to communicate privately that they wouldn’t pursue the grievance to arbitration because the working conditions were negotiated in good faith. The grievance process finished with district and union agreement the complaint didn’t qualify as a grievance.

I appealed the district’s answer to our community school board for what the district redefined as a “written complaint.” From October 2 to December 18 2020 the district was silent, despite policy promising a response within 30 days of the board’s receipt. After this December 13 reminder they were out of compliance for a response, the superintendent answered that the school board upheld the district response without comment.

I also received a “non-response” after nearly 5 months from my complaint to the US Department of Justice regarding unlimited government. My complaint to the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing complaint was fielded with a phone call response in December, with their promise to follow-up, and silence since then.

In March 2021, our NorCal public school superintendent sent all staff an email citing county deaths from COVID nearing 1,300 with 80,000 “cases.” He also asked for our professional responses to an upcoming survey. I responded with three basic questions: how many of our staff and students have died of (not with) Covid, what is the data for overall county deaths given controversy over causes of deaths, and how many staff and students have been injured by vaccines. He ignored my questions twice, which I then shared with our school’s ~100 teachers as Chair of a school Professional Learning Community (PLC) on broad educational topics directly affecting our school’s teaching and learning. A few teachers have communicated support, but our Social Science Department found no interest in this topic when I emailed them in inquiry.

Our district superintendent then answered my questions, and concluded with: “If you do not agree with the state and county guidelines or if you believe we are not following them, please pursue your questions and concerns with the appropriate agency.” I responded I would do so, and report my findings.

I followed up with 14 CA government agencies over 6 weeks, with all ignoring the question of how the limit of “beyond control” hospitals was being honored for “emergency” dictatorial authority, and CA Senator Glazer’s office stating the 60-day limit applied only to “non-safety” related orders. I hadn’t considered an American legislature would surrender forever dictatorial powers to a governor or elected officials without a time limit, as public recourse would be limited to recall (as is happening with Governor Newsom) or electing other legislators.

School district and CA government “answers” are therefore intentional lies of omission to claim they answered a question about ESA to “justify” dictatorial government while leaving out any consideration of crystal-clear letter and intent requiring that our hospitals are “beyond control.” The 14 CA government agencies claim dictatorial power to close businesses, stop social gatherings, force masking, force humans to forever remain no closer than six feet from each other, and with forever power until legislators or governor say otherwise, and while lying in commission that “emergency powers” are authorized by unreliable “positive” “cases.”

At the end of April 2021, I wrote a lengthy and fully documented report of those 14 CA government agencies’ responses, and emailed it with a cover letter to district leadership, school board members, teachers’ union leadership, our PLC members, and school teachers. The district’s Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources immediately responded with threats of disciplinary action for unspecified violations of district policies, as did my school principal. The district has yet to respond to my questions regarding their undocumented complaints as the “foundation” to their threats.

I appealed to our teachers’ union for relief (and here, here). After 4 emails and 15 days of silence from our union President and VP, I sent this email to 14 of the Board of Directors of our teachers’ union. Our President and VP then responded for a next step “to gain clarification regarding matters within our scope and discuss next steps, if any.” We Zoom-met, and our union President met with district Assistant Superintendent of HR on May 25, 2021. The district emailed me claiming my PLC report somehow “harasses or disparages” my colleagues “based on their political beliefs,” yet fails again to provide any documentation or explanation despite the union and my requests.

I filed three employee grievances for apparent contract violations, with our contract requiring my silence of proceedings. On July 8, I spoke by phone with our teachers’ union president, who reported that the district is again considering my Grievances as employee complaints, with HR Assistant Superintendent admitting failure to address my requests for the district to document and explain their complaints.

On July 9, 2021 our teachers’ union held a Zoom conference with ~100 teachers to explain the tentative agreement for work conditions for 2021 - ‘22 school year for staff, students, and families to obey “the most restrictive health measures” “ordered” by state, county or federal government. I asked the first question for our union to explain how the state has ordering authority given the strict limits of “beyond control” hospitals, with union president, VP, and another union board member responding they are still representing my question, but all legal information they’ve received is that there is no requirement to oppose ordering authority until proven in court.

My school district’s final answer to my three employee grievances came on July 21, 2021:
Teachers, staff, students and families will follow “health” “orders” because they are ordered.
“Health” “orders” are whatever is ordered. We will not respond to requests for documentation of what is ordered as “healthy,” nor even acknowledge the question was asked despite our legal obligation to explain how all policies are within the limits of the law.
If teachers ask further questions how our “health” “orders” are lawful or healthy, they will be disciplined up to termination under the “reason” that such questions “harass and/or disparage other’ political beliefs.”
On July 24 I responded to the district’s formal initiation of “disciplinary action steps” that lead to termination for unprofessional conduct by offering the district choice to finally cite their unsubstantiated complaints against me, withdraw the complaints and censorship, or face my attorney. On July 26, the district’s Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources responded in refusal to substantiate their claims of my unprofessional work; claiming “The District has provided you with the appropriate documentation that has sufficiently responded to your requests. At this time, there is no additional information that can be provided to you that has not already been provided.” Our teachers union President called me with analysis from her conversations with district leadership that the district is unwilling to look beyond their legal orders, and must be forced by court or legislative orders.

I had a productive first conversation with an America’s Frontline Doctors connected attorney, who promised to converse with her team to evaluate my case for possible lawsuit support. That said, the attorney has since missed three scheduled calls, so I’ll provide this report as a last offer before going back to America’s Frontline Doctors with renewed request for an attorney or referral. If any reader has suggestions, please let me know.

**
Update 1: I had a productive first conversation with an America’s Frontline Doctors connected attorney, who promised to converse with her team to evaluate my case for possible lawsuit support. That said, the attorney has since missed three scheduled calls, so I’ll provide this report as a last offer before going back to America’s Frontline Doctors with renewed request for an attorney or referral. If any reader has suggestions, please let me know. I see at least these legal areas of action:
Violations of contract and/or law.
Provable and damaging lies.
Threats, intimidation, harassment.
Refusal to document per se defamation on a teacher’s professionalism.
Censorship.
Attack on academic freedom.
Failure to explain a lawful basis for district policies other than prima facie illegal “just follow orders.”
Failure to document health and safety factual claims that “whatever” face coverings meet OSHA standards, and while threatening being fired, $1,000 fines, and a year imprisonment for non-obedience.
Failure to respond to our mutual Oath to “support and defend” Constitutional limited government, and failure to provide legal remedy to report violations as direct employer requiring this Oath.

My school district is directly attacking a foundation of limited government by embracing policy for unlimited dictatorship of whatever is said for as long as “leaders” “order,” then censoring and threatening a teacher simply asking how those public servants’ “orders” are authorized.

I seek a real-world civics lesson for all US school districts. I believe maximum compensatory and punitive damages is appropriate given the value of literally saving truth, justice, and the American Way.

**

Update 2: My August 30, 2021 email to district leadership, teachers’ union leadership, my school’s administration, and school committee members:

Subject: proposed HHS Solutions and Beyond! PLC email submitted for your approval

Dear Ms. Watts (and colleagues with HEA, HHS Admin, and HHS Solutions and Beyond! PLC),

In my previous HHS Solutions and Beyond! PLC sharing with HHS teachers, Ms. Watts initiated the first step of progressive disciplinary action against me, claiming my PLC report featuring HUSD and the most authoritative 14 CA government agencies’ failure to cite and explain how “health orders” were within clear legal limits (other than direction to “just follow orders”) was “harmful or inappropriate matter” that “could be construed as harassment or disparagement of others based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, sex, gender, sexual orientation, age, disability, religion, or political beliefs.”

HUSD then chose to refuse to cite what I wrote to explain and substantiate claims against my professionalism.

Therefore, I present a proposed HHH Solutions and Beyond! PLC sharing with HHS teachers dependent upon your approval. I give five business days to respond, or I will assume you find no contractual or other binding policy violation(s), and resume usual PLC sharing among interested teachers. If you find violations, cite them. Please note that reasonable people could interpret a lack of citation as an employer’s choice of ongoing harassment and per se defamation. If you refuse to cite HUSD’s complaints, please tell me the consequence should I send the PLC report anyway.

I place HUSD on notice that our mutual Constitutional Oath applies to all HUSD employees to ask OBVIOUS questions when “health order” authority is not explained or documented, and we’re inexcusably told the prima facie-illegal “just follow orders” or be fired and subject to $1,000 fines plus a year imprisonment.

As a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, US History, and Economics, and with 18 years’ lobbying experience, I admonish that HUSD’s position of ordering authority is absolutely refuted by crystal-clear limits to emergency ordering authority of “beyond control” hospitals and NOT problematic “positive cases” (and here, here). I admonish HUSD that the “reasonable person” standard of law can find HUSD guilty of criminal and civil violations given the clear explanation and documentation I’ve provided HUSD for a year.

HUSD leadership (as well as many political leaders) may be at further risk under Federal Article 18 Section 242: DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW:

TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

HUSD can avoid all this potential legal danger, and honor our mutual Oath by joining my question, rather than ignoring it while defaming my professionalism and initiating formal disciplinary actions threatening to terminate my employment for asking questions we teach all our high school students to ask.

Here is my proposed PLC email share with HHS teachers:

Subject: HHS Solutions: applying our Constitutional Oaths to prima facia-illegal “just follow health orders”

“For if Men are to be precluded from offering their Sentiments on a matter, which may involve the most serious and alarming consequences, that can invite the consideration of Mankind, reason is of no use to us; the freedom of Speech may be taken away, and, dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep, to the Slaughter.” ~ General George Washington, Address to the officers of the Army, March 15, 1783 (Newburg Address)

“I have sworn upon the altar of god eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.” ~ Thomas Jefferson, Sept. 23, 1800 (letter to Benjamin Rush, and chiseled as the most prominent quote within the Jefferson Memorial dome in Washington, DC)

Dear Colleagues,
HHH Solutions and Beyond! PLC addresses the broadest education issues with direct impact on HHS teaching and learning.

Last school year produced the worst decline in student productivity in likely district history, including doubled failure rates here at HHS. This PLC communication addresses this local HHS teaching and learning decline by considering how our mutual Constitutional Oath applies to question “health order” authority of the past distance-learning correlate to HHS doubled fail rates, and unknown outcomes for this school year dependent on future similar “health orders.”

Important to our consideration, HUSD and the 14 most authoritative California government agencies all refuse to explain or document their authority other than say “just follow orders.” All HHS teachers received the full report of HUSD and CA government agencies’ responses in the last HHS Solutions PLC sharing of April, 2021. If you’d like me to resend, please ask.

As always, if you’d prefer not to receive PLC emails from this committee, I’ll remove you at your request.

Our mutual Oath to limited government under our Constitutions

As California public school employees, we all take this Oath upon employment:

“I, (insert your name), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties upon which I am about to enter.”

Our Constitutions are the limits of government authority. Laws then further limit ordering authority. In our immediate consideration, when Governor Newsom declared a state of emergency on March 4, 2020, he did so under the limit in California Government Code 8558 (b) of “beyond control” local resources (hospitals in this case), or an imminent likelihood that hospitals’ patient numbers would be beyond their control. When “beyond control” hospitals never materialized, and without argument/evidence of further imminent threat, Government ordering authority is no longer authorized. Importantly, problematic “positive cases” (and here, here) do not equal “beyond control” hospitals.

Therefore, our Oath seems to empower (perhaps require) all of us employed by HUSD to at least ask for explanation and documentation how county and state “health” “orders” are lawful given their violations to our Constitutional Rights, and under direct threat of employment termination, $1,000 fines per violation, and one year imprisonment under Cal. Penal Code §§ 69, 148(a)(1), as Alameda County Health Orders warn the public after the title of each “order.” These threats extend to our students and families for permanent removal from HUSD, along with threats of fines and being locked in cages for a year.

What happened when I asked HUSD to explain their “ordering” authority + invitation to join me

Again, HUSD refused to explain and document the source of “ordering” authority given the limit of “beyond control” hospitals that is crystal-clear in letter and intent to prevent ongoing dictatorial government by governor and/or legislature. HUSD refused to do what we expect from all our Californian Middle School students in our State teaching standards: “Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources.” (page 81). HUSD refused through all three levels of employee Grievance and my appeal to the school board last year, and refused to revisit upon receiving my ~35-page documentation of six weeks’ work to contact the most authoritative 14 CA government agencies. When I (Herman) shared that report in April 2021 with HHS teachers to empower their voices and choices with the defining policies directly doubling our student fail rates and subsequent harm to graduation rates, HUSD initiated disciplinary action against me and censorship claiming the report was “harmful or inappropriate matter” that “could be construed as harassment or disparagement of others based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, sex, gender, sexual orientation, age, disability, religion, or political beliefs.” HUSD then refused to cite what I wrote to explain and substantiate their complaint.

HUSD has not responded to the fact that we teach all California students that “just follow orders” is an illegal defense and in prima facie violation of our mutual Oath to limit government orders under Constitutional laws that can always be cited and clearly explained. Explaining a law is as clear and simple as explaining a classroom or school rule to students, a sports rule, or a law while driving.

The prima facie facts explained and documented in this brief communication is sufficient evidence for all of us to exercise our Oath to request a clear and written explanation how ordering authority is under the limit of “beyond control” local hospitals to enable emergency dictatorial ordering authority.

If you would like to join my voice to renew request to the district of how their “health orders” are lawful, would like further information, or have an explanation to share of how our district and HHS health policies are within legal limits, please respond to me. I am in conversations with attorneys.

CDC releases plans of ‘isolation camps’ for the healthy to ‘shield’ the vaccinated, while Australia is building them???

As you may know, there are hundreds if not thousands of current lawsuits asking identical and similar questions as you read here. But there are further concerns you should know to empower your choices:
The CDC published a document titled: Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings, which explains CDC plans for “Covid-19”-declared house arrests, neighborhood lockdowns, evictions and/or relocations, and internment in concentration camps. This is literally what the plan documents. CDC promotes the plan on their website. I recommend this analysis of these documented and planned concentration camps for healthy Americans dictatorially-declared “at risk to their own and public health and safety.”
Dr. Fauci, political leaders, and corporate media are rolling-out rhetoric that the unvaccinated are a danger to the vaccinated, consistent with the above CDC planning to “shield” the injected from those refusing to be “patients of the state.”
The Department of “Homeland Security” (DHS) officially announced with a National Terrorism Advisory System Bulletin that Americans who challenge current and/or anticipated “government restrictions” “relating the the increasing COVID cases” (or to challenge what happened on 9/11 or the 2020 election) are engaged in “the broader sharing of false narratives and conspiracy theories” associated with “Violent Domestic Extremists” (DVEs) that “could serve as a catalyst for acts of targeted violence” through “online forums to influence and spread violent extremist narratives” (and here).
The Federation of State Medical Boards now threaten doctors with losing their medical license (and here) if they challenge official “consensus” pushed by CDC and WHO, perhaps by sharing the kind of data you’re reading here, or the data presented by Dr. Dan Stock to the Mt. Vernon School Board in these 6 minutes.
The Australian government in Queensland is building their first CDC-style "quarantine" camp, complete with 47-second advertisement to “keep you safe” and government proclamations how “good” it is to be “safe.”

Surge of ‘breakthrough’ cases + vaccine-related deaths

HUSD has “ordered” staff injections or weekly testing. New York City public school employees must be injected by September 27, 2021 to retain employment (they previously had HUSD’s policy or either injection or testing). Important data points on this topic:
Israel’s Medical Director for their leading respiratory care hospital (Herzog Medical Center in Jerusalem) reports that 85% to 90% of Covid hospitalizations are now among the fully vaccinated.
CDC stopped counting Covid cases among the vaccinated unless resulting in hospitalization and/or death. This means that CDC “case” counting appears as unreliable under-counted testimony.
CDC only counts Covid injection-related hospitalizations, ICU visits, and deaths after 14 days of being injected, which OBVIOUSLY fails to count vaccine injuries within two weeks of injection, and over-counts claimed hospitalization among the unvaccinated because an injection-related injury requiring hospitalization or death is counted as “unvaccinated” if it occurs within 2 weeks of the injection.
Despite the above two apparent statistical distortions for political purposes, CDC and VAERS still report ~14,000 US deaths following Covid injections, and ~84,000 serious injuries.
Europe’s database of vaccine injuries reports over 20,000 deaths and over 1,000,000 serious injuries following injection.
The US Department of Health and Human Services has failed to perform their required safety reports of vaccines for over 30 years. Therefore, claims of vaccine safety are false: “This means that vaccine makers have been fraudulently exempt from what all other pharmaceutical drug makers have been forced to do concerning biannual recertification for quality and effectiveness — meaning that their vaccines have never been tested for quality and have had no proven safety or effectiveness for over 30 years. This case can now be legally cited by all parents fraudulently mandated by any government/ organizational regulation/ requirements that they must vaccinate their children for school or any other activity to stop the forced vaccination of their children.”
Pfizer and Moderna destroyed experimental protocol by removing the human control groups by promoting their products, then injecting almost all of them.
CDC reports just 6% of “Covid-19 deaths” were solely from Covid-19, and 94% averaging 2.6 co-morbidities (~30% are obese according to CDC).
58% of claimed Covid deaths are age 75+ (80% 65+, and here).
~15,000 Covid-19 claimed deaths are from New York nursing homes where infected elders were transported like cattle despite available US military hospital ship at-the-ready (USS Comfort with 1,000 beds in NYC for a month, but seeing just 182 patients).
Up to 50% of total claimed Covid deaths came from such nursing homes (and here, here).
Hospitals were incentivized (and here, here) to receive $13,000 for Covid-19 positive diagnoses, and $39,000 if placed on ventilators with Covid-19 (even admitted by Snopes and factcheck.org). A ventilator “prescription” resulted in an 88% death rate.
Johns Hopkins University documents zero Covid-19 deaths among 48,000 healthy children studied.
Political and media “leaderships” argue strongly for vaccination, including creating separate classes of people based on “vaccination status” and percentage targets, while lying in omission so Americans are unaware of the above data.

Masks for students refuted by NIH + at least 31 studies

National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director Dr. Francis Collins is on the record stating policy of masks for school students is not based on scientific data.
CDC won’t remind us (neither will corporate media) that their own study found that masking students provides no statistically significant benefit to prevent virus transmission.
There are at least 31 professionally researched and published studies that conclude masks provide minimal to zero protection of virus transmission.
Another source with 47 studies conclude mask ineffectiveness to prevent virus transmission, with 32 more finding negative health effects.
And again: Johns Hopkins University documents zero Covid-19 deaths among 48,000 healthy children studied.

Hypocritical maskless ‘leaders’ + unprecedented global public protests

You’re all probably aware of the hypocrisy of many government leaders “mandating” public masking while being caught on film violating their own mask policies (a dozen examples here). A few more:
Neil Ferguson of Imperial College, whose computer model predicting up to 2 million American dead from Covid was used to justify emergency declarations in the US is now confirmed as a criminal lie, with that “official expert” caught having an extramarital affair in multiple violations of his own recommendation of healthy persons’ “quarantine.” Ferguson’s history includes predicting up to 200 million dead from Avian Flu in 2005 (low hundreds died), in 2009 predicting 65,000 dead in the UK (he was off by 64,500+), and in 2001 his false projections of Mad Cow Disease culled ~14,000,000 healthy animals (all here). Almost all Americans are unaware that this incompetent model from a proven incompetent was used to justify the worst economic attack on Americans in our nation’s history, as well as locking-out our schools.
5-minute video of Hawaii Lt. Governor Dr. Josh Green’s hypocrisy to require indoor masks for all, but when he hosts an August 24, 2021 political fundraiser for his aspirations for Governor, all donors are maskless while “hired help” wear masks (cost to attend: $1,000 to $6,000).
Investment Watch’s documentation of more lies you might want to see.

You may already know that global protests are growing against prima facie-illegal “health” “orders.” Some examples of public protests growing to hundreds of thousands of people up to millions (here, here for just two).

DHS National Terrorism Advisory System Bulletin equates challenging Covid policies to domestic terrorism

As cited above, DHS reports that those of us who challenge current and/or anticipated “government restrictions” “relating the the increasing COVID cases” (or to challenge what happened on 9/11 or the 2020 election) are engaged in “the broader sharing of false narratives and conspiracy theories” associated with “Violent Domestic Extremists” (DVEs) that “could serve as a catalyst for acts of targeted violence” through “online forums to influence and spread violent extremist narratives” (and here).

Is this PLC communication to inform teachers of Big Picture data points they didn’t know in order to inform their voices and choices an example of “domestic terrorism”? If so, here’s my last contributions of important data you didn’t know, and probably should, to pile on:

“With PCR if you do it well (increased test cycles) you can find almost anything in anybody.” ~ Kary Mullis, Ph.D, inventor of PCR, Nobel Laureate for Chemistry (more here, here, here, here)

“Guys like Fauci get up there and start talking, and he doesn’t know anything really about anything, and I’d say that to his face. Nothing.” ~ Kary Mullis, Ph.D, inventor of PCR, Nobel Laureate for Chemistry

“If you were in hospice and had already been given a few weeks to live, and then you also were found to have COVID, that would be counted as a COVID death. It means technically even if you died of a clear alternate cause, but you had COVID at the same time, it's still listed as a COVID death. So, everyone who's listed as a COVID death doesn't mean that that was the cause of the death, but they had COVID at the time of the death.” ~ Dr. Ngozi Ezike, MD, Director, Illinois Department of Public Health (and here)

In April 2020, The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) admitted two of their labs manufactured Covid-19 tests contaminated with the exact virus being tested, producing 100% false-positives and perhaps deliberate infection. In July 2020, Tanzanian President John Magufuli (Ph.D in chemistry) gave a speech to the nation reporting the World Health Organization (WHO) returned Covid-19 positive “tests” for a papaya, motor oil, a quail, and a goat (Magufuli died along with three other heads of state challenging WHO’s Covid-19 “testing;” all within 3 months and aged 52-61).

In July 2021, CDC withdrew a Polymerase Chair Reaction (PCR) test because it cannot “facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses.” This was the 6th revision (page 52) of “test” instructions that have produced up to 90%+ false-positives.

The CDC also admitted the PCR test was designed without Covid-19 material because Covid-19 samples do not exist (expert analysis with Dr. Jane Ruby here). CDC created the PCR test from known generic flu stock (page 40):

“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/?L) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.”

CDC subsequently responded to Freedom of Information Act requests that CDC has no records of an isolated and purified sample of the Covid-19 virus, thereby demonstrating CDC has no record for the existence of Covid-19 outside of unsubstantiated testimony. In fact, CDC has admitted they have no documentation of an isolated sample of Covid-19 on multiple occasions, as have WHO and almost 100 other leading international health and/or science institutes (19-minutes of expert testimony explaining how the factual claims for the measurable existence of Covid-19 are obviously and observably false, completely contrary to accepted science, and that is why the isolated samples do not exist [and more expert lab analysis]).

US flu cases were reduced ~99% (and here, here) since Covid-19 “testing.”

Pubmed reports: “large-scale analysis from China suggests that 80% of those infected either are asymptomatic or have mild symptoms.” This is also the finding of the Indian government, with 69% completely asymptomatic. The University of Chicago’s published research concurs that 82% to 87% of “positive cases” are without symptoms and any recognition of illness.

This admittance of no official existence of Covid-19 occurs as Alberta Canada ended all Covid “health orders” restricting personal freedoms just after an Alberta court case factual discovery disclosed that Alberta health authorities also could not provide any evidence that Covid-19 existed in any scientifically-measurable way, but only in political speech (and here, here). Gemma O’Doherty, an investigative journalist in Ireland, reports the Irish government also cannot provide any evidence for the existence of a Covid-19 sample (19-minutes of expert testimony explaining how the factual claims for the measurable existence of Covid-19 are obviously and observably false, completely contrary to accepted science, and that is why the isolated samples do not exist).

The CDC documented in “Certifying deaths due to Covid-19” (page 2):

“In cases where a definite diagnosis of COVID–19 cannot be made, but it is suspected or likely (e.g., the circumstances are compelling within a reasonable degree of certainty), it is acceptable to report COVID–19 on a death certificate as “probable” or “presumed.””

If we connect the above CDC’s instructions literally titled “Certifying deaths due to Covid-19” with the above quote from the Director of Illinois Department of Public Health Dr. Ngozi Ezike stating official policy to conflate “dying with a positive Covid-19 ‘test’ result” and “dying from Covid-19,” We the People have reasonable doubt for actionable information from official sources. Conversely, Americans would have to be naive and/or gullible to believe such declared “experts” given the totality of official disinformation and propaganda just partially documented in this brief communication.

Importantly, claims of “pandemic among the unvaccinated” are false because the CDC reduced the number of PCR cycles to “test” the vaccinated (? 28 cycles) while using 37+ cycles for the unvaccinated. Dr. Fauci and the WHO admit that 35+ cycles obviously produce false-positive results, consistent with PCR inventor Dr. Mullis’ quote above, yet this is exactly what “experts” and corporate media claim to “trust the science.” Subtracting false-positive “test” results might alter US data consistent with Israel and the UK of ~40% of newly-“tested” positive cases among the vaccinated.

And in important context: Dr. Marcia Angell, former Editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, and of Harvard's Medical School: “The combined profits for the ten drug companies in the Fortune 500 ($35.9 billion) were more than the profits for all the other 490 businesses put together ($33.7 billion) [in 2002]. Over the past two decades the pharmaceutical industry has moved very far from its original high purpose of discovering and producing useful new drugs. Now primarily a marketing machine to sell drugs of dubious benefit, this industry uses its wealth and power to co-opt every institution that might stand in its way, including the US Congress, the FDA, academic medical centers, and the medical profession itself.”

Why do corporate media report none of these data?

I have one published academic paper that includes a section that corporate media “reported” lies known to be false as they were told to promote the prima facie-illegal War on Terror (via the Claremont Colleges in 2015). If you want more detail on that subject, I wrote a 2005 ~40-page White Paper leveraged by Congressmember Kucinich for the impeachment of President Bush and Vice President Cheney for illegal Wars of Aggression (documenting those illegal wars is another section of my published paper).

I have direct experience of corporate media lying on the facts to end global poverty since 1981 at the cost of ~1,000,000 children dying in slow-motion agony every month. The total human deaths from preventable poverty just since the Clinton Administration is ~400 million, which is more than the total deaths of all wars and violence of any kind in all recorded human history. I report from 18 years’ work where I briefed Members of Congress on ~300 policy proposals that led to two UN Summits for heads of State. If you want a stunning and game-changing example of corporate media lying, scroll down to this 1990 New York Times disinformation “coverage” buried in the back of the paper about the largest meeting of heads of state in world history.

There is nothing to believe or disbelieve in this entire PLC communication; the facts are objective and independently verifiable.

Ok, again: what does any of this have to do with teaching and learning at HHS???

Again: HHS Solutions and Beyond! PLC considers broad policies that directly impact HHS teaching and learning. Current HUSD policies to uphold county and state “health” “orders” are illegal on their face because the foundational Constitutional laws refute masks and physical separations (and more), and Governor Newsom’s cited California Government Code 8558 (b) has the reasonable limit of “beyond control” hospitals to authorize emergency orders.

Because all Californians were lied to in omission to never receive comprehensive and independently-verifiable hospital data, and lied to in commission to substitute claimed and problematic “positive cases” as an illegal substitute for “beyond control” hospitals, AND that these policies directly impacted HHS teaching and learning by doubling our student failure rates, we teachers have every reason and right to demand an explanation how these polices are within limited government OR for HUSD to downgrade “orders” to “advice.”

In fact, our mutual Oath requires we either receive reasonable explanation and citation of ordering authority from primary documents, or we must take actions to honor our Oath to support and defend the Constitution of the US and California. HUSD and the 14 most authoritative CA government agencies’ current explanation to “just follow orders” is illegal on its face, and an insult to all our ancestors’ work and sacrifices for limited government upholding inalienable Natural Rights, and an attack on all our children’s education of equal treatment under Constitutional laws.

If you’ve made it all the way through, thank you for your attention :)

And again, if you’d like to receive further information, have questions or arguments, or to join my voice in this reasonable request for an explanation of legality to orders under threats of termination of employment, $1,000 fines, and being locked in prison for a year (or CDC camp), please let me know.

Just another Farmer nurturing roots of public education under American limited government,
Carl

**
I make all factual assertions as a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History (also credentialed in Mathematics), with all economic factual claims receiving zero refutation since I began writing in 2008 among Advanced Placement Macroeconomics teachers on our discussion board, public audiences of these articles, and international conferences (and here). I invite readers to empower their civic voices with the strongest comprehensive facts most important to building a brighter future. I challenge professionals, academics, and citizens to add their voices for the benefit of all Earth’s inhabitants.
**
Carl Herman worked with both US political parties over 18 years and two UN Summits with the citizen’s lobby, RESULTS, for US domestic and foreign policy to end poverty. He can be reached at [email protected]

Note: My work from 2011 to October 2017 is on Washington’s Blog, which the owner closed from Internet censorship in 2019, and here since. Work back to 2009 is censored by Examiner.com (blocked author pages: here, here). This means that some links in essays are inactive. If you’d like to see those articles, go to http://archive.org/web/, paste the expired link into the search box, click “Browse history,” then click onto the screenshots of that page for each time it was screen-shot and uploaded to webarchive.

Comments

SHARE THIS ARTICLE WITH YOUR SOCIAL MEDIA