"We must speak the truth about terror. Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th, malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves, away from the guilty."

G.W. Bush speaking before the UN GeGeneral Assembly 11/10/2001

RealMedia video of comment (151kB)

GW Bush on
9/11 Conspiracy Theories

Thu Dec 27 01:58:49 2001


GW Bush on 9/11 Conspiracy Theories
by Robert Lederman
(718) 743-3722
[email protected]
November 23, 2001

When President Bush spoke of "outrageous conspiracy theories" he
was for the first time acknowledging something of great significance. There
are informed viewpoints completely missing from the propaganda war being
relentlessly waged on Americans about 9/11 and its aftermath, viewpoints
which are as opposite from the official story as it is possible to get.

The Bush administrations' official story has three basic premises.
To briefly summarize, the first is that Islamic terrorists based in
Afghanistan who hate American freedom plotted and executed an attack on
America - an attack which the U.S. government had no prior knowledge of nor
any connection to. The second premise is that in order to wage and win a war
on terrorism we must invade Afghanistan and every other nation harboring,
funding or otherwise supporting terrorists and that a simultaneous
suspension of domestic civil liberties is necessary for internal security.
The third basic premise is that our government is all good while theirs is
the very personification of evil, the "evil-doers" as President Bush likes
to call them.

The "conspiracy theories" Bush is referring to similarly have
three basic premises and many divergent subsets. The first is that the
attack was known about (and possibly, planned) by various elements of the
U.S. government before 9/11 and was allowed to take place in order to bring
about certain conditions, including the suspension of our guaranteed civil
liberties. The second premise is that even if bin Laden and the al Queda
network based in Afghanistan were immediately responsible for the attack
that those supporting, funding and protecting them are not for the most part
based in Afghanistan but are in fact closely connected to the Bush
administration and to the allies President Bush has taken such efforts to
rally to our side. The third premise is that a U.S. built oil pipeline
through Afghanistan which has been in the planning stages for more than a
decade is the real goal of the war and that a U.S. invasion of Afghanistan
was in the works long before September 11th.
[Click Here for earlier Essay associated with this topic.].

What makes these alternative viewpoints, "conspiracy theories"? It
certainly isn't a lack of evidence.

In the American criminal justice system there are three basic
kinds of evidence; direct, circumstantial and exculpatory.

Direct evidence of a crime might include a confession,
fingerprints, DNA samples, credible witnesses or a surveillance tape proving
guilt beyond any reasonable doubt. Circumstantial evidence is anything that
lends credence to a defendant being guilty but in itself is not sufficient
to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Exculpatory evidence on the other
hand disproves a defendants' guilt or contradicts other evidence proving
their guilt. In a recent NYC case involving exculpatory evidence, a homeless
man charged with a vicious sidewalk assault on a tourist was found to be on
a store surveillance tape recorded at the same time the assault took place.
In the American system of criminal law prosecutors are required to share all
exculpatory evidence with the defense.

The official story as told by the Bush administration and the U.S.
corporate media is constructed of "evidence" the government frankly admits
would not be admissible in any court of law. If anything, the Bush
administrations' version of events is itself a very weakly constructed
"conspiracy theory" challenged at every turn by an enormous amount of
exculpatory evidence, much of it from the Bush administration itself. No
wonder Bush insists on trials by military tribunals for suspected
terrorists, trials in which virtually none of the evidence will be revealed
to the defendants or their Bush-appointed defense attorneys.

It's absurd to claim that such trials will have any similarity to
those at Nuremburg after WWII. The accused Nazis were given every
opportunity to mount a full defense and were directly confronted by hundreds
of witnesses for the prosecution who they were able to fully cross-examine.

There is one very striking similarity to Nuremberg however. Like
today's accused terrorists, the Nazis were funded and supplied by some of
Americas' wealthiest businessmen including GW Bush's grandfathers who
operated Wall Street banks, shipping companies and other businesses as
fronts for the Nazis [1].
Osama bin Laden, the Taliban and the largest sources of financing
for terrorism are also intimately connected to the Bush family and to Wall
Street, to some of Americas' leading corporations and to members of both
Bush administrations.

The need for complete control of all information and media
coverage along with a 24 hour a day propaganda effort to depict support for
the Bush administration as a patriotic duty becomes obvious once one has
even briefly considered the exculpatory evidence. Not only might it be
difficult to convict the so-called terrorists in a legitimate court of law
but support for either the war or the Bush administration would be virtually
impossible once the full facts were known.

Nevertheless, being a loyal American I must support the
Presidents' position in the war on terrorism with one additional point. The
American people should hold President Bush to his own professed standard as
explained in the following quote.

In his remarks, the president again laid out what the White House
called the Bush Doctrine.
"If you harbor terrorists, you are terrorists. If you train or arm
a terrorist, you are a terrorist. If you feed a terrorist or fund a
terrorist, you're a terrorist, and you will be held accountable by the
United States and our friends."
NY TIMES 11/22/2001 Bush Says War May Go Beyond Afghan Border

In other words, the President, the CIA, his father and many of
their business partners, cabinet appointees and so-called allies are - based
on the President's own words - terrorists.
Only by bringing them to justice can we ever hope to win the war
on terrorism.


[1]

BOSTON GLOBE 4/23/2001
TRIUMPHS, TROUBLES SHAPE GENERATIONS

PRESCOTT BUSH PAVED MODERATE
PATH FOR SON AND GRANDSON;
WOUNDED BY FRIEND'S BETRAYAL,
HE PUT HIGH PRICE ON LOYALTY
Page: A1 Section: National/Foreign

AN AMERICAN DYNASTY

Prescott Bush was surely aghast at a sensational article the New
York Herald Tribune splashed on its front page in July 1942. "Hitler's Angel
Has 3 Million in US Bank,"read the headline above a story reporting that
Adolf Hitler's financier had stowed the fortune in Union Banking Corp.,
possibly to be held for "Nazi bigwigs." Bush knew all about the New York
bank: He was one of its seven directors. If the Nazi tie became known, it
would be a potential "embarrassment," Bush and his partners at Brown
Brothers Harriman worried, explaining to government regulators that their
position was merely an unpaid courtesy for a client. The situation grew more
serious when the government seized Union's assets under the Trading with the
Enemy Act, the sort of action that could have ruined Bush's political
dreams.


Sarasota Herald-Tribune 11/11/2000
John Loftus, former US Justice Dept. Nazi War Crimes investigator
and President of the Florida Holocaust Museum, is quoted as saying:
"The Bush family fortune came from the Third Reich."
(Click Here for original story)

http://baltech.org/lederman/9-11-unpopular.html



%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20Hermann%20Goering,%20Hitler's%20#2 Man:
Why of course the people don't want war. Why should some poor slob
on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best he can get out of it
is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally the common people don't
want war: neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany.
That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who
determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people
along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a
parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can
always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have
to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for
lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in
any country.

George Orwell
In a time of universal deceit, TELLING THE TRUTH is a revolutionary act.


Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson,
The Supreme Court In the American System of Government (1955)
I cannot say that our country could have no central police without
becoming totalitarian, but I can say with great conviction that it cannot be
totalitarian without a centralized national police.
A national police will have enough on enough people, even if it
does not elect to prosecute them, so that it will find no opposition to its
policies.


(Author's note: After its founding following WWII, the CIA was
initially staffed with thousands of former Nazis who were experts in
propaganda, biological warfare, eugenics and social control as recently
admitted by the CIA itself.
For excellent published works on the CIA/Nazi connection read:
Trading With The Enemy by Charles Higham, The Secret War Against the Jews by
Loftus and Arrons and Blowback by Christopher Simpson.


UPI 9/20/2000
CIA says Nazi general was
intelligence source
COLLEGE PARK, Md., Sept. 20 (UPI) --
The Central Intelligence Agency has for the first time confirmed
that a high-ranking Nazi general placed his anti-Soviet spy ring at the
disposal of the United States during the early days of the Cold War. The
National Archives said in a release Wednesday that the CIA had filed an
affidavit in U.S. District Court" relationship
with German General Reinhard Gehlen that it has kept secret for 50
years...The CIA's announcement marks the first acknowledgement by that
agency that it had any relationship with Gehlen and opens the way for
declassification of records about the relationship," the National Archives
said Gehlen was Hitler's senior intelligence officer on the Eastern Front
during the war and transferred his expertise and contacts to the U.S. as
World War II reached its climax. While Gehlen's relationship with U.S.
intelligence during the 1940s and 1950s has been the topic of some five
books over the years, the eventual release of CIA documents pertaining to
the development of his European spy ring could shed new light on the origins
of the Cold War and early U.S. espionage efforts against Moscow. Gehlen's
network of agents in Europe - including many with Nazi backgrounds who were
bailed out of prisoner of war camps by U.S. intelligence officers - was
known as the Gehlen Organization and received millions of dollars in funding
from the U.S. until 1956. The CIA's acknowledgement of its dealings with
Gehlen came in a response to an appeal of a Freedom of Information Act
request by researcher Carl Oglesby, the National Archives said. The agency
pledged to release its records on the general in accordance with the Nazi
War Crimes Disclosure Act.


San Francisco Bay Guardian May 7, 2001
"Honest and idealist ... enjoys good food and wine ...unprejudiced
mind ..."That's how a 1952 Central Intelligence Agency assessment described
Nazi ideologue Emil Augsburg, an officer at the infamous Wannsee Institute,
the SS think tank involved in planning the Final Solution. Augsburg's SS
unit performed "special duties," a euphemism for exterminating Jews and
other "undesirables" during the Second World War. Although he was wanted in
Poland for war crimes, Augsburg managed to ingratiate himself with the U.S.
CIA, which employed him in the late 1940s as an expert on Soviet affairs.
Recently released CIA records indicate that Augsburg was among a rogue's
gallery of Nazi war criminals recruited by U.S. intelligence shortly after
Germany surrendered to the Allies.


Washington Post Sunday, March 18, 2001
By George Lardner Jr., Staff Writer
Page A04
CIA Declassifies Its Records
On Dealings With Ex-Nazis
Documents May Give Clues About Obstacles in Hunt for War Criminals

The CIA is finally getting around to declassifying the records of
its dealings with former Nazi spies after World War II. It says it has found
251 boxes and 2,901 file folders of potentially relevant documents --
apparently more than 250,000 pages -- and that it will take about two years
to complete work on them.


Daily News 4/28/2001
Secret Files Show U.S. Used Nazis
...The documents show that high-ranking Nazis--including death
doctor Josef Mengele and Adolf Eichmann--were coddled by American and Soviet
spymasters as World War II ended. "The real winners of the Cold War were
Nazi criminals," Justice Department official Eli Rosenbaum said. "East and
West became so rapidly focused on challenging each other that they lost
their will to pursue Nazi perpetrators. They even deemed some of the
criminals to be useful allies."

See also: Conspiracies, Cover-Ups and Deceptions - Index of What Really Happened


What Really Happened

Email This Page To A Friend